If you are using Internet Explorer 6, you may not have the best Bebo experience. Please consider upgrading.
Rauhecker Family
-
Female,
1
- from United States
- Profile views: 68
- Last active: 2/2/10
- www.bebo.com/RauheckerF
Advertisement
- Me, Myself, and I
- Welcome
close Blog
-
SCI/230 - AAGO0I5IY0 final grade
The faculty member has posted grades for this course (You can also go to your student website to view the details).
Wendy Rauhecker
SCI/230 - AAGO0I5IY0
Grades through Week 9 Cumulative Score:
767/1000 (76.7%)
Grade : C+
Possible Score Your Score
Week 9
Capstone CheckPoint 50.0 50.0
Comment: Content and Development (30 points possible)
* Response presents the students opinion on the role humans must play in
preserving threatened regions. 10/10 points
* Response summarizes how the interests of competing groups should be balanced.
10/10 points
* Response addresses how the United States and international groups should be
involved with conservation in other countries and includes supporting reasons.
10/10 points
Readability and Style (8 points possible)
* Sentences are complete, clear and concise. 4/4 points
* Paragraphs flow logically from thesis to conclusion. 4/4 points
Mechanics (12 points possible)
* Rules of grammar and punctuation are followed. 4/4 points
* Spelling is correct. 4/4 points
* Response is 200 to 300 words. 4/4 points
Wendy,
This is a great essay with well thought out ideas!! I especially like your
common sense approach.
Leslie
Final Project: UNESCO Paper 200.0 187.0
Comment: Content and Development
The paper includes research beyond the UNESCO Web site. 8/8
The paper identifies ecological uniqueness of property in terms of plant and
animal life. 10/10
The paper is 1,400 to 1,750 words in length. 7/8
** 1,110 words in length.
The paper describes the diversity of life forms found in the area. 8/8
** Well done.
The paper describes the biological interrelationships among the life forms in
the area. 3/8
** This point is addressed very vaguely.
The paper explains what human intrusions threaten the area. 8/8
** Very good!
The paper explains what protections exist to protect and preserve the area. 8/8
** Very good!
The paper explains what efforts have been made to further this preservation. 8/8
The paper explains what an individual can do to help preserve the diversity of
the area. 8/8
The paper includes what else needs to be done. 8/8
The paper includes what will be lost if intrusion goes unchecked. 8/8
The paper develops a central theme or idea directed toward the appropriate
audience. 7/7
The paper links theory to relevant examples and uses the vocabulary of the
theory correctly. 8/8
The paper utilizes at least three Web sites or other reference materials beyond
the UNESCO Web site. 9/9
The introduction provides sufficient background on the topic and previews major
points. 8/8
The conclusion is logical, flows from the body of the paper, and reviews the
major points. 8/8
Readability and Style
Paragraph transitions are present and logical and maintain the flow throughout
the paper. 7/7
The tone is appropriate to the content and assignment. 7/7
Sentences are complete, clear, and concise. 7/7
Sentences are well-constructed, with consistently strong, varied sentences. 7/7
Sentence transitions are present and maintain the flow of thought. 7/7
Mechanics
The paper, including the title page, reference page, tables, and appendixes
follow APA guidelines for format. 7/7
Citations of original works within the body of the paper follow APA guidelines.
0/7
** Sources were not cited within the body of the paper.
The paper is laid out with effective use of headings, font styles, and white
space. 7/7
Rules of grammar, usage, and punctuation are followed. 7/7
Spelling is correct. 7/7
Wendy,
You wrote a great paper! You addressed most of the major points of the
assignment and showed a deep understanding of the UNESCO site. You did not
clearly address the biological interrelationships. You could have included
some detailed examples. You should be very proud of the work you put into this
final project!
Leslie
Week 9 Subtotal : 250 237
Cumulative Week 9 Subtotal : 1000 Comments 57 weeks
-
PSY/220 - AAGI0I54T1 final grade
Wendy Rauhecker
PSY/220 - AAGI0I54T1
Grades through Week 9 Cumulative Score:
759/1000 (75.9%)
Possible Score Your Score
Week 9
Participation 10.0 10.0
Comment: Hi Wendy,
You made good contributions to the discussion in this final week. Your insight
and positive energy in the discussions helped accomplish a successful wrap up
for the course. Good work. Jean
Capstone Discussion Question 20.0 20.0
Comment: Hi Wendy,
Your capstone response was thoughtful and I enjoyed hearing your closing
comments for the class.I encourage you to continue growing and working toward
your goals. Good luck. Jean
Final Project: Personal Topics Presentation 250.0 250.0
Comment: See Feedback previously posted to your Individual Forum.
Week 9 Subtotal : 280 280
Cumulative Week 9 Subtotal : 1000 759
Week 9 Feedback: Hi Wendy,
Your work on the final showed good understanding of all that we learned in the
course. I hope you continue to benefit from what you have learned in these
past few weeks. Good luck with all your future plans. Jean
Week 8
Assignment: Optimism and Health Paper 100.0 68.0
Comment: See Feedback previously posted to your Individual Forum.
CheckPoint: Fostering Hope Presentation 30.0 30.0
Comment: See Feedback previously posted to your Individual Forum.
Week 8 Subtotal : 130 98
Cumulative Week 8 Subtotal : 720 479
Week 8 Feedback: Hi Wendy,
It looks like you had a difficult time keeping up this week. I hope everything
is ok. Jean
Week 7
Discussion Questions 10.0 10.0
Comment: Hi Wendy,
Your DQ responses were well done. You made excellent points and showed good
critical thinking. Jean
Participation 10.0 10.0
Comment: Hi Wendy,
Your comments this week were very good and helped to keep our discussion
interesting. You met full participation as well. Good work! Jean
CheckPoint: Humility Action Plan 30.0 30.0
Comment: See Feedback previously posted to your Individual Forum.
Week 7 Subtotal : 50 50
Cumulative Week 7 Subtotal : 590 381
Week 7 Feedback: Hi Wendy,
Your assignment and posts this week were very well done. Good work. Jean
Week 6
Assignment: Changing Perspective Paper 100.0 100.0
Comment:
CheckPoint: Pursuing Happiness Presentation 30.0 30.0
Comment: See Feedback previously posted to your Individual Forum.
Week 6 Subtotal : 130 130
Cumulative Week 6 Subtotal : 540 331
Week 6 Feedback: Hi Wendy,
The quality of your work this week was good. You showed good critical thinking
on both assignments. Jean
Week 5
Discussion Questions 10.0 10.0
Comment: Hi Wendi,
Your DQ responses this week were very good. You addressed each part of the
question. You shared examples that were useful to your classmates and added to
the discussion. Good work. Jean
Participation 10.0 7.0
Comment: Hi Wendy,
The comments you made were good, but you missed full participation by not
posting at least twice on three different days. Jean
CheckPoint: Fostering Commitment 30.0 30.0
Comment: See Feedback previously posted to your Individual Forum.
Week 5 Subtotal : 50 47
Cumulative Week 5 Subtotal : 410 201
Week 5 Feedback: Hi Wendy,
You took the questions this week seriously and answered from a personal level.
I hope you continue to maintain your commitments and grow toward your goal.
Good luck. Jean
Week 4
Assignment: Wise Judgment Scenario 100.0 0.0
Comment: Assignment not submitted.
CheckPoint: Intelligence vs. Wisdom 30.0 30.0
Comment: See Feedback previously posted to your Individual Forum.
Week 4 Subtotal : 130 30
Cumulative Week 4 Subtotal : 360 154
Week 4 Feedback: Hi Wendy,
Your CheckPoint was good, but you did not submit the written assignment. If you
are struggling, please let me know how I can help. Jean
Week 3
Discussion Questions 10.0 10.0
Comment: Your DQ responses were on topic and showed thoughtful0 Comments 57 weeks
-
SCI 230
Grade Summary (Week 1-Week 3)
Total Percentage: 75.42%
Your Total Score: 181
Total Possible Score: 240
Week3
Possible Score Your Score
Assignment: Photosynthesis & Cellular Respira 80.0 --
Comment:
Not yet graded
CheckPoint: Mitosis and Meiosis 30.0 27.0
Comment:
Content and Development
Explains why the processes of mitosis and meiosis are both important to a living
organism. 6/6
** Well done!
States when an organism would need to undergo mitosis and meiosis. 6/6
Addresses what would happen if meiosis did not occur. 6/6
** Good answer!
Readability and Style
Sentences are complete, clear and concise. 2/2
Paragraphs flow logically from thesis to conclusion. 2/2
The tone is appropriate to the content and assignment. 2/2
Mechanics
Rules of grammar and punctuation are followed. 2/2
Spelling is correct. 2/2
Response is 200 to 300 words. 2/2
Wendy,
You did a great job on this assignment! You have a clear understanding of
mitosis and meiosis and understand the importance of each. The CheckPoint was
posted 1 day late so is penalized 10%.
Leslie
Exercise: UNESCO Research 10.0 8.0
Comment:
* Includes the name of the chosen natural property for the final paper. 4/4
* Includes an APA formatted reference list of three sources 4/6
Wendy,
Manas Wildlife Sanctuary is a great choice! I think you will enjoy this topic.
You listed 3 sources, but they are not in APA format. Please review APA
formatting at the Center for Writing Excellence. You can reach the CWE from
the Library tab, then click on Tutorials & Guides and choose "APA Reference &
Citation Samples" and use the "Citation Generator."
Leslie
Week 3 Subtotal : 40 35
Cumulative Week 3 Subtotal : 240 181
Week 3 Feedback:
Week2
Possible Score Your Score
Discussion Questions 20.0 15.0
Comment:
DQ1 (10pts possible)
Response addresses all parts of the DQ substantively. 5/6
Response follows the rules of proper grammar usage and correct spelling. 2/2
Response is a minimum of 200 words. 2/2
** You chose to refute the idea of spontaneous generation; however you did not
include any supporting evidence such as Redis experiments described in the text
book reading. Your DQ1 response was posted 1 day late so is penalized 10%.
DQ2 (10 pts possible)
Response addresses all parts of the DQ substantively. 4/6
Response follows the rules of proper grammar usage and correct spelling. 2/2
Response is a minimum of 200 words. 2/2
** You explained the similarities and differences between prokaryotes and
eukaryotes. There was some confusion over the mitochondria. You stated they
are a kind of DNA. Mitochondria are eukaryotic organelles that produce energy
from breaking down food. They contain some of their own DNA. You did not
provide a scientific answer to explain why eukaryotic cells evolved. Because
this is a science class we need to stick to ideas that can be backed up with
scientific evidence, not religion. Your DQ2 response was posted 1 day late so
is penalized 10%.
Participation 10.0 0.0
Comment:
Wendy,
You did not participate in the DQ threads in Week 2. Please remember that you
are required to participate two times per day on three separate days for a
minimum of six posts. If you need some ideas of how to start, please read the
Substantive Participation note in Course Materials. It lists some great tips
on creating substantive participation notes.
I really hope to see your ideas and thoughts in the DQ threads in Week 4!
Leslie
CheckPoint: Plants vs. Animals 30.0 27.0
Comment:
Content and Development
Response includes a screen shot of the conclusion screen of the Plant and Animal
Cells exercise. 10/10
Response includes a list of five similarities and three differences between
plant and animal cells. 8/8
Response describes at least five functions of internal structures of either
plant or animal cells. 5/5
Respo0 Comments 63 weeks
close Recently Played Games
Try out our most captivating games.







Hey you!!!