My late father, Alan Edward Hindley, a wealthy man, unexpectedly died on March 14th 2002; his death is shrouded in deceit and conspiracy which enables the perpetrators to get away with fraud and forgery.

I cannot apologise for the bluntness of my previous statement when the evidence collected from many sources, including: a Forensic Expert, Mr Michael Ansell BA, MA, MFSSoc., witnesses, the police and courts, to mention a few, all confirming my initial fears and subsequent beliefs.

All relevant and necessary routes open to me have been followed in order to seek justice, and over the past 7 years my every turn has been met by concerned ears and sympathetic tongues, which are deafened and silenced shortly afterwards.

With the copious files full of facts, figures and findings and a log of events since my father’s death, my uncle, Peter Hindley, began the task of compiling a dossier which could be published on the Internet. Feeling that our story was in the public’s interest on May 16th 2008 we published our first blogs containing an account of our experiences as executors and trustees; what has been published to date is readable at http://www.myspace.com/saphireanimal; additional sites are: http://www.howsafeisawillintheuk.com, facebook, bebo, twitter, yahoo etc. All parties, involved and mentioned, were made fully aware before and during the publication, and I feel sure have read our entries. There has been no attempt to stop or challenge anything that has been made public; this also includes from those in the establishment. I am not surprised that all is silent when every word we have published is absolutely, true and correct.

Thousands have read our experiences and have shown much support and encouragement in our fight for moral justice. The experiences of others who have suffered similar or equally corrupt injustices have come forward to share their stories with us.

I approach you in order to seek your expertise and support in seeking justice, not only for my late father but for the thousands who find themselves in similar circumstances.

Thank you for your time and I hope that you can find a way of helping me in this diabolical situation. I would dearly love to honour my late father and have his house put in order.

A Log of correspondence with The Devon & Cornwall Constabulary

Compiled by Susan

1 November 2002 - Letter sent to address retrieved from the Internet addressed to the Chief Constable, Chudleigh, Newton Abbot, asking for information about a possible investigation that might be underway.

15 November 2002 - I had a conversation with Sergeant Griffiths of Chudleigh Police Newton Abbot. Searches were made by Sergeant Griffiths and no information was logged to say that the police had been called to, or visited the house or Torbay Hospital at the time of death. The procedures for a sudden death were explained to me; they had not been followed. Furthermore the ambulance and Doctor’s procedure were not standard. The sergeant advised me to contact the Coroner at Torbay Hospital and the Chief Constable in Exeter.

26 March 2003 - Letter sent to the Chief Constable, Middlemoor, Exeter. I voiced concerns regarding the matter that Sergeant Griffiths of Chudleigh Police, Newton Abbot had checked his records and was unable to find any information logged to say that the police had been called to, or visited the home of my father or Torbay Hospital at the time of his death. Sergeant Griffiths’ opinion was that I should take the matter further by writing to the Coroner and Chief Constable Wallis and supplied the address.

28 March 2003 - Received a card from Maria Wallis Chief Constable. (Your correspondence has been forwarded to Chief Superintendent McGrath at Paignton.

12 April 2003 - Letter sent to Chief Superintendent McGrath explaining that I had feared my father had not died of natural causes and I wanted to share information I had with him.

15 April 2003 - Received letter from Chief Superintendent L P McGrath. Letter stated that matter had been forwarded to Inspector Blackhouse at Paignton and I would hear further in due course.

27 May 2003 - Letter sent to Inspector M. Blackhouse, Paignton with eight points that needed further clarification. These matters related to The Coroners Report, the Initial Report to Coroner and the Request for Post-Mortem.

15 July 2003 - Received letter from Detective Chief Inspector K Tilke detailing findings from his investigation in reply to points raised in my letter of 27 May 2003.

23 August 2003 - Letter sent to DCI Tilke in reply to his letter of 15 July 2003. I voiced my concerns that the matter had been taken so lightly that I had not been interviewed regarding allegations made.

24 August 2003 - Letter sent to Chief Constable Wallis enclosing a copy of letter to DCI Tilke.

7 September 2003 - Letter to DCI Tilke regarding my late father’s will, which included the fact that this will, without the wishes had been sworn at Bristol Crown Court, without my knowledge or agreement.

16 September 2003 - Letter received from Detective Chief Inspector Kevin Tilke. He writes to acknowledge papers received dated 7 September in connection to my father’s will. He states the original file has been forwarded to an officer for independent review prior to considering further enquiries they will conduct. He adds that as soon as he has a result he will let me know their intended course of action.

30 October 2003 - Letter to DCI Tilke re his previous letter dated 16 September, which had stated I would be informed of the intended course of action. I expressed that Peter Hindley (brother of the deceased) would like a meeting with DCI Tilke and would be prepared to go to his offices.

30 October 2003 - Letter Sent to Chief Constable Wallis enclosing a copy of letter to DCI Tilke.

12 February 2004 - Letter sent to Jonathon Shaw MP requesting his help.

19 February 2004 - Letter from Chief Inspector S D Lander to Jonathan Shaw MP.

10 March 2004 - Kept an appointment at Paignton Police Station with DI Taylor and Peter Hindley. We left relevant correspondence and a detailed account. The interview lasted almost three hours, he took notes but not everything was discu

Chapter 21

Just to reiterate. Wendy had told me during a the week following Alan’s death that she was proceeding with the purchase of the freehold of the plots, which formed part of the grounds, leased from the previous owners of Shorton Cottage, namely Digby Willoughby. I was puzzled by her haste and I had assumed that this packet of land would, by reading Alan’s will and wishes, be part of his estate, therefore Susan and I should have been involved in any transactions as executors and trustees. Wendy had been so curiously covert in her recent undertakings; all this contributed further to my motivation to get legal advice.

It was within weeks of Alan’s death that Susan and I first had an appointment with my solicitors in order to gain reassurance and to enquire about our responsibilities as executor and trustees of my brother’s estate. This we felt was fully justified as a result of Wendy’s callous behaviour since Alan’s death and her wilful self-reliance that was tantamount to deliberately obstructing our access to anything relating to my brother’s estate and will. We needed clarification about our duties and liabilities.

I had had previous dealings with this legal practice when they handled the conveyancing of the two properties since my divorce. Michael French had taken on the problems with the Council Tax on the first house in Cuxton Road and then, with the second house, the house builder’s permission for the conservatory was overlooked before completion of the purchase.

Neither incident could be classed as negligence, nevertheless I was pleased to have Jane Barter involved with our case; her work would be meticulous. I have seen that Michael is very good when looking at the grand picture, but he has been known to falter on the detail. None of us are perfect.

Michael, the senior partner, was not available on that particular day so another solicitor, Jane, saw us. His practice is housed in offices that consist of two high street shop units, built about 1900, with several floors above. The receptionist announced our arrival to the solicitor who was to see us today and the person, who was to help us, swiftly greeted us. This was to be the first meeting with this neatly turned out lady, who by her tidy businesslike clothing, grooming and manner gave the impression that she would miss nothing in her work. All the ‘I’s would be dotted and the ‘T’s crossed with precision, no detail would be missed. Reassuring qualities for what may lie ahead.

Jane treats us in a friendly efficient manner as she shows us to the large office on the first floor above the reception. From the two front facing, lofty sash windows we can see the 1960’s office block opposite, it contains the local government departments and crown courts. The edifice obstructs the view of the river Medway; but not completely, as either side of the squat tower, the vista unfurls to reveal the curves of the river as it meanders up and down stream. Inside the office there is a hotch-botch of miss-matched furniture and filing cabinets, as you may expect to see in a solicitors practices.

Jane settles herself behind the large mahogany table while offering us the use of jacquard upholstered mahogany side chairs. She arranges the six A4 sheets of photocopied paper that makes up Alan’s will and wishes; the contents digested she raised her head to look at us and I look into her eyes to see that the somewhat coy persona conceals an astute lively brain. She started her explanation of our duties and liabilities as executors and confirms to us that we would become responsible for anything that we put our signature to in its’ execution.

Apparently our duties are to include our confirmation that everything submitted to the probate office is correct and we are entitled to have a full disclosure of everything that is used to compile the probate papers to enable us to do this. So far there has been no divulgence; we know nothing. More