This link is to an article the famous actor Charlie Sheen has written to bring to public attention the fact the the events of 9/11 are a cover up.

The article is a fictional meeting between Sheen and Obama.

The only information that is made up in this meeting is the president's responses, all other information about 9/11 are real.

For example 65% of 9/11 investigators of the 9/11 commission have publicly stated that the 9/11 commission report is a cover-up by the government and the real reasons for 9/11 remain classified.

read this article Charlie Sheen has requested a real meeting with the president, and made this in order to try and get a response from the white house.

http://www.infowars.com/twenty-minut...

Well folks as some of you know,i went to Manchester to see the UEFA cup final and now, here is the promised blog were you will read everything you need to know about what went on.It is going to be a bit of a long one,as it was an experience like never before and for those of you who werent there this is essential reading,rangers fan or not.

I'll talk about the journey,the build-up,the booze hunts,the atmosphere,the game,the fans,the riots,the police and i'll even show you seven and a half minutes of un-cut riot footage shot on my mobile phone as it all kicked off big time.

I will get all the negative stuff about the final out of the way first as its a major talking point.

THE RIOTS

As all of you are aware,there was quite a bit of trouble. It is not how the news people are reporting it however.All of the footage you see on the news is rangers fans attacking the riot police,but what they dont show you is the police attacking innocent rangers fans,which is what kicked it all off.

Now, im not saying there wasnt dickhead trouble makers there causing havoc,as there was quite a few bampots in town that day.It doesnt help matters when police smack a fan over the head with a baton,before any fan carried out violence against the police that you see on BBC news.

Three things caused the riots.(most of this information comes from rangers fans,who had kids with them located at piccadily gardens,i was at the albert square screening)

1-The big screen went down at piccadily gardens just as the match was about to start,this pissed people off big time as the game is why everyone is there. Some bottles were thrown around in anger,like i said by some bampots.(note there was no bottles thrown at police just into the air,which is fucking stupid,but the point is no violence towards the police at this stage)

The screen didnt seem as if it was coming back on(which it didnt,ever),so as you can expect the rangers fans tried to leave to watch it anywhere they could. The police however had other ideas and stopped the rangers fans from leaving the set out screening area.This made the fans even more angry as they were missing the game.

2- The police panicked and over reacted to the jostling of the fans,and one fan was struck over the head by riot police,naturally this in-raged the surrounding fans and they retaliated towards the police.The police hit back,fans throw bottles,charge,the police hit back and so you have a full scale riot before the match is even at half time,so this was not a case of "oh rangers got beaten and then kicked off with the cops".

3- the police are blaming the booze-i say everyone was fine with the amount of booze they had,and only a few dickheads were were chuckin bottles in the air,which was the ONLY bit of bad behaviour pre-riot,pre-screen failure,pre-police baton bashing. Bottle throwing,although outragous it is controllable. Full scale riot is much more difficult. Would the riots kicked off if booze was taken out of the equation? yes is the answer. Did booze help? no of course not,but reasons 1 and 2 are much more important.

THE POLICE

After the match, i headed up towards piccadily gardens,unaware of what has been going on up there, nobody knew execpt the police. So i have to ask this question-why did they let the rangers fans at albert square leave and put them in danger of getting caught up in the riots?,because thats exactly what happend to me and there were people with young kids,even whole family's.

The train station(piccadily) is at the top of the high street just past piccadily gardens thats were most people from albert square were headed-straight into the direction of the riots. The police knew trouble had kicked off yet they allowed ordinary rangers fans to walk right into a riot zone.I was lucky not to get hurt and quite a few people did.

One guy is in the daily record with his head burst open,and that was inflicted by the cops-he was one of such people caught up in the middle o

Lets make one thing clear before i get started on with this--I have been listening to daft punk long before the were as big as they are now. Im talking about before they came out with their 'homework' album.

Now when daft punk did that album,that is the time i was really into them. After they went all 'disco' i stopped liking them and i still to this day,hate, the 'discovery' album. The reason for this was that they RIP OFF and sample other peoples music. I told this to daft punk fans at the time and they said no way, thats not samples. At the time i couldnt give them the names of the tracks daft punk had sampled as they arnt well known songs.

Now sampling other peoples music happens quite alot, so whats the problem you ask? well the problem is that daft punk base their whole of their songs on the samples they use,not only that but they dont just sample a little bit of other peoples music the take whole sections of work other people have made and pass it off as the "daft punk sound" basically if you took away the samples that they use they wouldnt be left with a tune for you to hear.

On my bebo main profile page you can see a video called "where daft punk get their samples from" watch this video and you will see what i mean. Now, there are only about 5-6 daft punk songs used in the video but you will be left wondering how much of their other songs are other peoples songs as they are using these sections of music that real musicains have made and fooling everybody into thinkin that daft punk have "talent" most shocking is their tune ROBOT ROCK,which is the song that brought me back into liking daft punk.

that whole song is just one big rip off, really it is,watch the video and you will hear for yourself.

as a musician myself and big big fan of daft punk-i sorta feel cheated, can they do any of their own music? do they have talent?its is so easy to buy some computer software that enables you to take any bit of music and make it fit any tempo and it does it all for you, your granny could do it and it takes no musical talent what-so-ever.

i make music, i use professional computer recording software and REAL instruments to make it, i play the keyboard and guitar and i never use samples of other peoples tunes,sometimes i use a vocal sample, but thats cause i cant sing(lol) and dont have a singer.

one of my tunes-Electric sheep, is often compared to daft punk,and rightly so. But there is one big difference, there are no samples of other people playing instruments or sections of peoples music in my tunes-there is a vocal sample used from dub be good to me in there, but you cant make a whole tune out of one vocal sample.

you can listen to electric sheep here and see for your self--- its the fourth song down http://www.bebo.com/Profile.jsp?Memb...

after seeing that daft punk video, i cant listen to "their music" anymore as i know its just two guys sitting in front of a computer ripping off real, talented musicians. Yet everybody thinks they're shit hot,and they make alot of money.

fuck daft punk, no wonder they hide their faces in those power rangers helmets.