Let's have a change of pace shall we? Instead of tackling the complex and simplistic...let us have a look at the human mind as a whole: Sin, Vice, morality.

Three things that every human commits and has the ability to commit. "Every human being has the potential to commit good and evil acts."

We've seen that one cannot title good and evil in generalized terms, we've even looked at morality. Sin and Vice are religious terms, but even so...any act of self-gratification (hedonism) could be considered as such. For example, "A sin against man" would be one man killing another in order to have his wife. This is shown in Hamlet. Hamlet's uncle kills his father then marries his mother (A tad incestuous...but oh well.)

With that out of the way, common day sins against the nature of man:

Smoking - Releasing hormones from the pituitary for a 'high' or sorts.

Over-active sex drive - Pleasing one's self before the partner, would be the closest we can come too. Although lust in itself is human nature.

Alcoholicism - Excessive drinking can be bad, this is my 'sin' or 'vice', not just biologically but also in the clarity of the mind.


Not a major thing really, more of a pittance. But take myself for example. I commit all three...I suppose that would make me a sinner. But if one can find me a single human being in the entire world who hasn't pleased himself/herself before others...I will bow my head and admit ignorance and idiocy.

Of course one will question how this has to do with nihilism. Normally I'd say in the perception, the breaking down. However that is not the case this time.

Nietzsche wrote, "Will is the power of man; willingfulness of women." A rough paraphrase. But if man has the will, then he would be responsible. Now, reciprocate the actions onto a woman...would that make her clear of blame? Not at all.

This is a criticism, not an example of application.

I have run out steam sadly, I shall finish this on another day.

To quote a rather popular book, "War is Peace". A rough paraphrase.

War, a great many people have wondered about this topic. But what is war, truly. People have described war as "a contest carried on by force of arms, as in a series of battles or campaigns". In a more populace based context, war is the act of passing righteous judgement upon the evil of the world.

If we looked at it objectively: There exist two sides of every conflict, each side fighting for their sense of 'justice'. In that sense, pushing one's own sense of justice upon another could be considered an injustice.

War is, of course, the easiest form of this rant on justice and injustice.

Justice - the quality of being just; righteousness, equitableness, or moral rightness.

Injustice - the quality or fact of being unjust; inequity.

If one were to take these with absolute meaning, then no shades of grey exist. Therefore it would seem possible that all could be defined as just or unjust. Theory is often different when put into practice. Different ideals lead too very different views. This of course is commonly known, elitists often use this as their starting point.

Perhaps one could apply a satyr to the world's views of justice. Or perhaps it has already been done. Movies based upon War for instance, can be considered a Satyr by the nations that had opposed them. The constant heroics would be called an attempt at hiding the cowardice. But that is all relative.

Many words exist, all to describe positive and negative concepts. However seeing as it depends upon perception, are not those words without meaning?

I've gotten off track yet again.

Justice and Injustice, many ornamental words can be placed in their stead. The fact remains, by pursuing justice we inherently perform injustice. By subjugating someone to our sense of justice we commit the very thing we seek to erradicate.

Another perfect example in simplified terms: A soldier.

A soldier is called a saviour, a defender. A liberator. With all these titles cast aside there remains only one; Murderer. Any amount of justification cannot change the fact that in the name of righteousness, or god, they take the life of another human being. Is that not one of the direct commands of God, as said in the Bible? In short, a soldier is a murderer for reasons all his own, a particle of proof...justice is injustice and vice versa.

Mmm, I seem to keep the sense of "contradiction" well within all my rants...how amusing. Farewell good readers, until the next.

Since time in memoria there has been the constant battle of opinion, most prevalent of which is the existence of "Good and Evil". Good; the essence of morality, the correct, obligation of the masses. Evil; the immoral, an inescapable generalization of anything that is irrelevent to our sense of justice. But what then is Good and evil? Can a man take the life of another's in anger and be labelled a hero? Can a man take another's life in the name of freedom and be labelled a murderer? Mmm, truly ironic.

On the subject of life's material worth...why then do we wage war? Do not the masses call bloodshed immoral? Isn't it evil? Each second ticks upon our clocks, a split second decision based upon illusion...what is evil and good. Is that decision not the epitomy of injustice? Prosecution, execution. What are these terms and how are they applied to ourselves? We prosecute the masses based upon our self-inflicted ignorance, we execute the whims of our erant bliss. All int he name of what? In the name of justice, of good. So in the end it can be assumed that all humans are two-faced, immoral and moral. This stems from the logical, and the illogical.

As any Nihilist can see, the disconnected thoughts...are all complimentary. Nietzsche's philosophical points are apparent well within here.

Back to the main concept at hand, Good and Evil. With our past enshrouded in the biased opinions of others, our lives are abstract - They always were...- But this is arbitrary. Imagine, if you will, that life and death are two equidistant points. Which is the one we inevitably head too? With that in mind, think of Good and Evil in similar terms. Inherently we like to believe that we head towards the "Good". But to quote someone, "The path to hell is paved with good intentions."

Think now of your emotions, are they not swayed by the general opinion. Do you not feel yourself heading towards the aesthetic, a pleasant ephemeral mirage.

In the end however...all things amount to nothing, for all the metaphors that have been slung about...they are nothing and yet everything. To elaborate...the words I am writing in, even this explanation of it, were made by humans. We do not know that the words we speak truly mean what we infer. A mere implication. So accumulate this belligerant form of indoctrination...feel this 'wisdom' fill your mind. Freedom is merely a concept that we know nothing about. So relish in your self-induced hysteria when things go awry, wallow in your self-pity when you realize the totalitarian nature of the world. Relinquish your capricious heart to material items that have no true worth.

By this I mean:
When the world finally stops turning -if it ever does- shall we finally see whether or not we were right or wrong. Life does not constitute free will, love does not guarantee happiness. With all these things inside your head...will you be the paranoid, or the disillusioned. As written in the Holy Bible, "The Meek shall inherit the world" This is metaphorically correct. The meek, or those not capable of overcoming the flaws of intelligence, will be the ones deified.

Once again, in closing I leave off with a Latin quote;

Nomine et dominus, est amor mori? Memento Mori.

English Translation: Name the master, is love mortality? Remember your mortality.